Right Conspiracy

You want to upset the Left´s dominance of the minds of the population (in your country, or in the West, and so on). 

RightConspiracy knows the best way to achieve this. 

It's the best way because we tackle what counts: the thoughts of the population. And because I have identified the best ways to influence its thoughts. 

It's not a quick-fix. It's work that takes years. Many years.

The current phase is the startup. It's the early adopters who will join or create their own clone of the project. 

One place where communication should take place is X.com. The hashtag is "RightConspiracy". 

Here are ways to change the minds of the population:

Right Not Racist. The concept of "honor" is a primal force. It has its roots deep in the human psyche. Today, the right is often accused without reason of being racists and intolerant in other ways that are reprehensible. This diminishes the honor of the right. It happens when terms like "far-right" are used even though the extreme individual doesn't actually want lower taxes. The right is then wrongly portrayed as an ideological relative of the extreme. Defending one's honor can be motivated by basic emotions like anger, fear, pride, solidarity. These are emotions that a rational person uses healthily for their benefit and should also be used to resist being wrongly associated with racism. Verbal campaigns should be launched against those who call extremists "right-wing" even though the extremists don't want lower taxes. When the right is no longer wrongly associated with racism, the battle has been won. Then, the population will no longer see the right as an ideological relative of racism and will therefore be more favorably inclined towards the right. This will garner more votes for the right. More votes mean more frequent right-wing governments and stronger ones, leading to countries becoming more right-wing. The right should, in a peaceful way, not "turn the other cheek" when it comes to this!

Better Democracy. Almost everyone wants democracy (also Long March Right). But how many want better democracy than today? Achieving better democracy doesn't stir as many emotions as moving from autocracy or dictatorship to democracy. But maybe it stirs some emotions? SubversiveRight hypothesize that better democracy stirs enough emotions to work on this. The idea of better democracy builds on an evolution of Joseph Schumpeter's definition of democracy, which is that democracy exists when there's sufficient competition among those seeking political power. The evolution is that organizations influencing the political opinions of the population, for a country as a whole, must be as much left as right. When this happens, they won't create a bias favoring the left or right politicians more. Such bias would mean unfair competition among those competing for political power positions, making the quality of democracy worse. A second hypothesis that SubversiveRight have is that in western countries, left-leaning individuals hold more positions in opinion-influencing organizations than right-leaning individuals do, for instance in traditional media, social media, universities, and unions, and this is bad for democracy. When more right-wing individuals and fewer left-wing individuals work in opinion-influencing professions to improve democracy, right-wing perspectives and opinions will spread more from these organizations, resulting in the population being influenced to become more right-wing. Then, the population will increasingly vote for the right, leading to more and stronger right-wing governments, making western countries more right-wing. In the name of democracy, choose a career in a profession that influences the political opinions of the population if you are right-wing, avoid it if you are left-wing!

DEI programs, that is, programs for "Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion." Organizations that require their employees to publicly support left-wing opinions should be exposed so that right-wing individuals can avoid working there. What's of interest to the right is "equity," because only this, not "diversity" or "inclusion," is political. Organizations should not force employees to express opinions like the existence of social rights (there should only be civil liberties and rights) and that everyone is entitled to equal economic and material resources ("equal outcome"). When an organization is exposed for demanding left-wing loyalty from its employees, it's reasonable that they start to stagnate because half of the population, i.e., the right, won't want to work there. This leads to organizations ceasing to demand left-wing statements from employees, allowing employees to stand upright (compare with the left-wing concept of "upright walk" (may be an incorrect translation) from the 1960s and 1970s; not bending the spine) and perhaps not being steered towards having left-wing opinions. This might lead Western countries becoming more right-wing.

The right's "long march through the institutions." The left-wing man Rudi Dutschke coined this term. The left would not make a revolution in the West but "infiltrate and gradually transform established institutions from within," institutions like universities, media, and government (source: AI CoPilot). "The expression draws an analogy to the Chinese Red Army's Long March, symbolizing a long-term and strategic effort" (CoPilot). Right-wing equivalents to this should be promoted. We need right-wing intellectuals or radicals to bring forward corresponding concepts for the right. The purpose would be to make the population more Right. 

Political Dreams. Every westerner should have a fair chance to use politics to realize their political dreams, visions, and ideals. Does someone who wants their country to have very low taxes have a fair chance to achieve that? Doesn't many countries have a left-wing bias in unions, "legacy media," social media (thanks for Musk buying Twitter), and universities that stand in the way? If right-wing individuals don't have a fair chance to realize their political dreams, it might be justified to use left-wing expressions to describe this situation: right-wing individuals are oppressed, proletarians, subjected to inequality, injustice, and structural discrimination, etc. Paintings of workers under the boot of capitalism could be transformed to show persons of the right under the shoe of left-wing organizations. These concepts can awaken much power, and if this power can be channeled into legal and constructive expressions, it could be beneficial for the right. The more the population sees the right as oppressed, the more right-wing individuals will start working in media etc. to overturn this, and the more the population will be influenced by these organizations to become right-wing. This will give the right more votes in elections, and the West becomes more right-wing. If I am wrong about this, let me know.

Right-wing Unions. Perhaps unions should be started that are right-wing in every way, including influencing its members to vote for the right.

These are points to change the population's thoughts to be more favorable to the right. It will take a long time and be strenuous, but it will be worth it.